tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC August 20, 2012 6:00pm-7:00pm PDT
the military, the budget under mr. obama certainly has not been defense centric, bumet he has perpetuated a legacy that some have found problem at, even on the left. we have to talk about love, justice and democracy and not give into those who are the hatemongers. >> michael eric dyson, great to have you with us tonight. that's "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. the "rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, ed. and thanks to you at home for being with us this hour. this is james leon holmes. he goes by leon, not by james. but he was the president of the arkansas right to life group. he headed up in arkansas an effort to amend the state's constitution to ban all abortion. even in instances where the pregnancy could hurt the mother or where it was caused by incest or where it was caused by rape. the idea that being a rape victim might be enough to excuse you from the state forcing you to carry a child to term, that idea really got under james leon
holmes' skin. he wrote a letter once to the editor of the moline daily dispatch explaining people should stop worrying about rape victims in cases like this. quote, concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in miami. that's james leon holmes. he wrote that in 1980. during the george w. bush administration, president bush gave him a lifetime appointment as a federal judge. james leon holmes is now the chief judge of the eastern district federal court in the state of arkansas. >> this is clayton williams. in 1990, clayton williams was the republican candidate for governor of texas. he was running against ann richards. ann richards beat him pretty well in the general election, but not before clayton williams told reporters that rape was a little bit like the weather. as long as it was inevitable, women should just lay back and
enjoy it. in june 2008, clayton williams was scheduled to headline a fund-raiser for then republican presidential candidate john mccain. he was scheduled the headline the fund-raiser until people started to ask if he agreed with clayton williams about when women should enjoy rape and then they canceled the fund-raiser. in 1988, a long time antiabortion leader in the pennsylvania house of representatives argued for criminalizing abortion even for rape victims by saying this, quote, the odds are 1 in millions and millions and millions that a woman would get pregnant from being raped. and why is that? he had an explanation. he said, rape obviously is a traumatic experience. when that traumatic experience is undergone, a woman sureets a certain secretion which has a tendency to kill sperm. in 1995, a republican state representative in north carolina, a man named henry aldridge made his case that rape victims should not be spared from a new crack down on
abortion rights because quote the fact show that people who are raped, who are truly raped, the juices don't flow. the body functions don't work and they don't get pregnant. he said, quote, to get pregnant, it takes a little cooperation. in 1998, in arkansas again, the republican u.s. senate candidate running against blanche lincoln, a man named fay boozman was reported in a local arkansas paper to have told a crowd at a political gathering that there was no need for a rape victims' exception to making abortion criminal because of something he described as god's little shield. he later denied using the exact phrase god's little shield, but he did explain further that based on anecdotal information he had collected as an optionthalmologist, he knew that real rape victims could not get pregnant from a rape biologically speaking. in 1999, the former president of the right to life committee published an article that
anti-abortion activists link to online today. all the same thing the republican men have been saying for years that women don't get pregnant when they're raped. these guys in the anti-abortion movement and in the anti-abortion movement side of paolitics keep arguing, making this case in public because it has important policy consequences for them. if you can't get pregnant by being raped, anybody who is pregnant by definition was not raped. it cannot have been a rape no matter what you say, you must have wanted it if you ended up pregnant. if you wanted it, there's no reason to feel sorry for you and let you end this pregnancy. you should have thought about that before you lured your supposed rapist to do this thing that you secretly wanted. what was the line there? to get pregnant takes a little cooperation. so we know you secretly wanted it. otherwise you wouldn't be pregnant and we wouldn't not be talking about what the government is going to force you to do with regard to your
pregnancy. exceptions to the government's decisions based on you supposedly being raped, those are bs exceptions. because any woman who says she wants an abortion because her pregnancy is a result of a rape, by definition, she's lying about the rape thing. that's the reasoning here, right? that's why you need to come up with the cockamamy fake science theory if you want to talk about that as a policy. quietly over the last few years as the republican party has slipped its moorings post bush and cheney, as the party apparatus has fallen apart and the conservative movement has stepped in and taken over in the party's place, as that has happened over the last few years, rape and incest exemptions have fallen out of favor. for have already been people in republican politics who thought rape victims had it too easy and we should stop coddling the rape victims, the lying rape victims who secretly wanted it. those folks were always around
in anti-abortion politics and republican politics, but now, nay have taken over. it was sarah palin's take in 2008 there should be no exceptions for rape and incest victims when the party would criminalize abortion. in twoub 10, it was the position of a whole bunch of republican senate candidates. sharron angle as the republican u.s. senate canddant in nevada. she said the government forcing a rape victim to bear the rapist's child should be thought of as a way to make lemonade out of lemons. also christine o'donnell in delaware, she lost, in by joe miller in alaska, he lost, and by rand paul in kentucky. he won. it was also championed by ken buck in colorado. he lost a senate seat in 2010 in colorado. a seat that republicans never otherwise should have had any business losing. >> i am pro life and i'll answer
the next question. i don't believe in the exceptions of rape or incest. >> the ken buck position is not an outlying position for the republican party anymore. it has become the new republican normal. yeah, so called person-hood amendments to ban all abortions including for rape and incest victims and to ban hormonal birth control and many fertility treatments, the personhood amendments got voted down by huge margins in 2008 in colorado and in 2010 in colorado, and 2011, even in mississippi. by the following year, by 2012, by february 2012 in the republican presidential primary, ron paul and newt gingrich and rick perry and rick santorum had all signed on to personhood as their policy position. rick perry even went so far as to repent on the campaign trail this year for previously saying there should be rape and incest exemptions to criminalizing abortion. this year, rick perry said watching one of mike huckabee's
dvds changed his mind and he too believed rape and incest victims should be forced by the state to give birth against their will. >> in new hampshire, in georgia, in indiana, in virginia, in idaho, south carolina, in iowa, republicans in all of those states in the past couple years have moved to overtly goarve rape victims and incest victims and anti-abortion laws removing protections they used to have in law. in the house of representatives, when republicans voted on a new abortion ban for washington, d.c. recently, it of course had no exceptions for rape victims or incest victims. the third bill addressed by the republican majority, hr-3 was not just a federal roll-back of abortion rights. it initially tried to redefine rape in federal law, creating a new category called forceable rape. what i guess you might think of as real rape, to, what?
distinguish it from nonforceable rape, the kind of rape women secretly want and like? republicans upon taking control of the house in their third bill, sought to redefine rape because the old definition of rape apparently included too many things that women wanted to be protected from when we all know they were the kind of rape that are really no big deal. paul ryan, the republican vice presidential nominee, was an original cosponsor of the bill to redefine rape. to make it harder on rape victims who wanted to get an abortion. the bill eventually dropped the redefining rape language, but paul ryan was a sponsor of the bill while the original language was still in there. he was also a sponsor of the federal version of the personhood thing that had failed in colorado twice and in mississippi. because even in mississippi, personhood language that would ban all abortions with no exceptions at all including for rape and incest and would also ban hormonal birth control and some fertility treatments was too extreme for mississippi, but paul ryan sponsored it for the
whole country. he also sponsored a federal version of bob mcdonnell'sul ula sound bill. where they force them to get an ultrasound against their will and against doctor's orders. paul ryan's bill for doing that at the federal level had no exemptions for rape or incest. the furor in virginia over the forced ultrasounds bill is wi widely viewed as having derailed bob mcdonnell's chances at this his chances of being this year's republican nominee. he wasn't famous for much else, now he's governor ultrasound. of course he can't be the vice presidential pick. in skipping governor ultrasound, mitt romney honestly picked someone else who had the exact same policy record as governor ultrasound. why didn't the same policy record also derail paul ryan's chances at getting picked for the number two spot on the
ticket? now that todd akin has become the latest republican politician to articulate the pseudo scientific thinking behind this laund thinking strand of republican politics, now that there's a full scale freakout about his viability and his insanely out there politics on the issue and how the republican party can afford to keep a guy like that on the ballot in that important race, once again, you have to ask why the freakout about todd akin when the republican party has picked somebody with the exact same track record, with the exact same policy record, his co sponsor on all of the bills to be the party's vice presidential nominee. >> if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has wayed to try to shut that whole thing down. >> this is a moment of instability in republican politics. todd akin, mr. legitimate rape there, he's apologizing now for those remarks, but he's not changing any of his policy positions that derive from that belief that he holds. and of course, for now at least,
he's staying in the race for that missouri senate seat. at li he's trying to do. mitt romney as a presidential candidate said he would have supported a personhood constitutional amendment at the state level. he told mike huckabee when mike huckabee asked if he would support something like that, he told him, absolutely. mr. romney then picked the national personhood guy for his vice president. a congressman who sponsored bills to redefine rape and force women to have medically unnecessary ultrasounds. he picked for his vice presidential nominee a politician who has never in his political career supported exemptions for pregnancies caused by rape and incest. but now, today, out of the blue with people disgusted by todd akin's explanation of the thinking behind the policy position, we're told by the romney campaign to ignore mr. romney's previous statements and to ignore paul ryan's whole political career. we're told that what has been their policy position is no longer the position of the campaign that is promoting these
candidates. even if they have not quite yet come up with a story yet for why paul ryan in particular might have changed his mind on this subject, for why he might think now that rape victims deserve more empathy from the government today than he thought they did two days ago. this is a moment of instability in republican politics. they're going to have to figure out which way to go on this. the republican party let this strand of strange politics grow within its midst. they let it become mainstream republicanism. and now the republican party is witnessing the country recoiling from what the party has become. you know, governor ultrasound, bob mcdonnell, he may not have gotten the presidential nod this year, but you know what he got as a consolation prize? a sign to oversee the republican party platform for this year's election. the national platform has supported criminalizing abortion since 1976 with no exceptions for rape or incest. republican party has always counted on that being kind of
quietly ignored in national politics. noticed by the activists to whom they answer but not noticed by any of us. do you think they'll still take the paul ryan/todd akin position on rape victims in the national platform again this year or do you think now that's going to have to change? bob mcdonnell is the one who decides. joining us now is frank rich, writer at lark for new york magazine. mr. rich, great to see you. >> great to be here, rachel. >> it's all in bob mcdonnell's hands. >> as long as he's not waskivin wand. >> you have to excise all magic wand references when talking about bob mcdonnell. the romney/ryan campaign spent the day trying to run, not walk, away from todd akin's views and paul ryan's policy positions where he has been a cosponsor of a lot of this really radical antiabortion ledge slafer. do they keep running from it and
prepd it wasn't his record or do they turn and start to defend his report? >> i think they're going to have to defend his record because they can't eradicate it, and what about the presidential candidate's record? after all, romney has called for defunding planned parenthood, defunding title 10, which is not only gives contraception access to american women but cancer screening, even abstinence education. we also have to say that mitt romney belongs to a church where women have secondary positions, they do not have the full rights of men. >> has he every spoken about whether he believes that portion of his church's teachings? >> not to my knowledge. instead, he says things like, i'm going to send ann out to canvass women and see what they think and report back to everybody. i think we're seeing a cycle that just keeps repeating itself. when the whole sandra fluke
contraception rush limbaugh fracas happened, everyone was embarrassed in the republican party who wants to win because it blew the story. it told america what this party is about in terms of women's issues. and my view, humani issueissues much the way you describe them. at the time, people like vin weber and peggy nunen said this will all die down and people will forget. and particularly, if rick santorum, the hardest line guy on these issues in the premaries is gone, everyone will forget, but it keeps popping up because this is actually the policy of the party. now they're hopeb akin will go away just as they hoped limbaugh would lower his slut language and the rest of this, but this is the party. if mcdonnell tries to fool with the hard line language, it will put it more in the spotlight because the real base of the party that supports people like
akin will complain and scream and yell about it. >> and fight it. how we got here is interesting and where we're going is interesting. ha we got here i think is the party falling apart and the conservative movement, which has always bolstered the republican party, has stepped in. they don't have any gsker whatsoever when it comes to radical antiabortion politics. there's nobody in the conservative movement saying don't push on the rape and incest exemptions. that's going to weird out republican voters and women. there's nobody who can speak in a way to shut them down. w where we're going is a confrontation between the romney campaign and the conservative movement base of the party which will fight if they try to take a stance. >> they will, and frankly, since romney has proved to back down at almost any confrontation throughout this campaign, going back to the primaries, whether it be about immigration, doesn't matter what the issue is, he backs down.
he's not going to fight these people. and furthermore, who would be his allies? who are the people in that party who are going to stand up for women's rights? this is a party where in the senate, the entire republican caucus voted for the fluke -- what was it called, the flake amendment? the blunt amendment, excuse me, the blunt amendment, which allowed employers to sort of basically stop any kind of health care coverage that dealt with women's issues. it wasn't framed that way. the only one to vote against it was olympia snowe who is leaving the senate. so there's no there there for people who would stand with romney/ryan if they wanted to take the disingenuous position they that support exceptions on abortion. >> i don't even know what happens tomorrow on this let alone in the long run because we do have them saying now with romney/ryan administration would allow abortion for rape victims,
even though that's plainly in contradiction from their previous stances. >> they would never enforce it. it's the same thing as when romney said, rush limbaugh had a bad choice of words. >> i wouldn't have said slut. >> i wouldn't have said slut. it's a fig leaf they hope will fool these mythical, i think largely, independents that are so easily fooled. i don't think people are so easily fooled. i don't think they're fooling republicans, democrats, independents, or anybody. it's a desperate attempt to put it back on the back in the eve of the republican convention. >> where the fight is going to happen. they haven't finalized their platform. bob mcdonnell is in charge. todd akin has to make his decision by tomorrow. we should stay on tv all night. >> let's do it. >> frank rich, writer at large for new york magazine. i should say your article in this week's magazine is about nora efron and it's brilliant. thank you for writing about that. >> republicanser shorts of
sending him back and getting a refund, what do you now do with todd akin? time is short and the river is rising. that's next. and later, two men might be fired for making it easier to vote. it's a big story with big national implications and the people in the middle of this ongoing big deal are going to be joining us for the interview tonight. that's an exclusive here and it's coming up. re miles for their "destination wedding." double miles you can "actually" use. but with those single mile travel cards... [ bridesmaid ] blacked out... but i'm a bridesmaid. oh! "x" marks the spot she'll never sit. but i bought a dress! a toast... ...to the capital one venture card. fly any airline, any flight, anytime. double miles you can actually use. what a coincidence? what's in your wallet? [ all screaming ] watch the elbows ladies.
2000, the electiballot in missos unique. the incumbent, john ashcroft, also listed on the ballot was his challenger, democratic governor mel carnahan. melcarnahan by election day was no longer alive. he had been killed in a plane crash less than a month earlier. >> governor mel carnahan was on his way to a campaign rally in a small plane that went down in heavy fog and rain near st. louis. the first word came last night from a spokesman for the governor. >> it is with great sadness that we report that earlier this evening, a plane believed to be carrying governor mel carnahan, his son roger, and senior campaign adviser chris shifered went down in jefferson county. >> carnahan died along with his son who was piloting the campaign and his campaign aide. carnahan was running for a u.s. senate seat against john ashcroft. >> governor carnahan died just a few weeks before the election in
missouri in 2000. and that meant that democrats did not legally have time to replace him on the ballot for that senate race. state law didn't allow it. in a pinch, the acting governor told the people of missouri if they voted for mel carnahan on their ballot, the acting governor would appoint mr mr. carnahan's widow to the senate seat. on election day in the year 2000, john ashcroft was in the uncomfortable position of technically running gebagainst dead pirn. he ran against a dead pirn and he lost to that dead person. >> john ashcroft was faced with the delicate and difficult proposition of running against a man who is dead. here's where it stands at this hour. in missouri, two thirds of the vote have been counted. mel carnahan, who is now deceased, obviously, is within striking range of john ashcroft. in missouri, nbc news is projecting that mel carnahan who was killed in a plane crash, has been elected over john ashcroft,
the republican incumbent. >> 12 years after the john ashcroft versus a person who is no longer among us race, the good and great state of missouri is once again facing a bit of a ballot problem. if you think it's complicated when one of the candidates dies, look at what they're dealing with this year. congressman todd akin was just picked up by republican voters in missouri to be their senate nominee, to challenge the sitting democratic u.s. senator claire mccaskill. yesterday, todd akin doused his political career, lit a match, and you know the rest. >> if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has wayed to try to shut that whole thing down. let's assume maybe that didn't work or something. i think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child. >> of the republican senators and senate candidate this year are calling on todd akin to step aside, to let another republican run against claire mccaskill for
that senate seat. republican senator mitch mcconnell, the senate minority leader urged todd akin to quote take time with your family to consider whether the statement will prevent you from effectively representing our party in this critical election. john corner said over the next 24 hours, congressman ackin should consider what is best for him, the republican party, and the and has fought for. and even less subtle was the national part a ay pulling its million dollars of ad from the campaign. they have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the campaign, but they pulled their ads for him today. and yet, and yet, congressman akin says this right now, he's not resigning. he also says please donate money to my campaign, okay, thank, good-bye. he said he's not leaving. his son is running his campaign.
his wife is said to be his top political adviser. they're not pushing him out, but the republicans who are pushing him out are pushing with some urgency. that's because it appears that time is of the essence here. remember, 12 years ago when mel carnahan died a few weeks before the general election, missouri state law did not let democrats replace his name on the ballot. this year, if the november election is going to be free of todd akin, there's not many ways to get his name off the ballot in this senate race. the easiest is for him to voluntarily withdraw from the race. the deadline for him to do that is tomorrow office 5:00 p.m. local time. tomorrow is the 11th tuesday before the election, and that's the deadline, according to state law. if he gets out before 5:00 local time tomorrow afternoon, a republican committee in missouri will get to pick his replacement to be on the ballot against claire mccaskill. there's one other sort of strange option for how he can get his name off the ballot which would give him a little more time to think about it.
according to missouri state law, a candidate who has filed or nominated for an office may withdraw pursuant to a court order. and if he withdraws pursuant to a court order, then the deadline is no later than 5:00 p.m. on the sixth tuesday before the election. the sixth, not the 11th. so if he does it that way, if he tries to get a court order to take his name off the ballot, he will buy himself five more weeks to make the decision. the sixth tuesday before the election is september 25th. between now and september 25th, could todd akin get a court order to get himself off the ballot? i don't know. could the democratic secretary of state in missouri or somebody else challenge that court order if he did get one? theoretically, yes. how would the republicans deal with that possibility? we don't know. we called and wrote to the missouri state republican party for comment and their rules and strategy for dealing with the p predicament. we have yet to hear back from him, but we live in hope. step down by tomorrow, get a
court order somehow by next month, deal with the possible objections to it, or of course, there's always the third option, todd akin, mr. legitimate rape, could stay in, in the missouri senate race, so he doesn't step down. republicans don't force him out, but then the republican party will therefore be running a senate candidate in an important swing state in a presidential election year who is a policy clone of the republican vice presidential nominee and who has just been caught on tape explaining that if your body didn't rejeblth the rapist's sperm, it wasn't really a rape. those are your three options, republicans. tick-talk, tick-tock. package... oahhh! [ male announcer ] it made a big splash with the employees. [ duck yelling ] [ male announcer ] find out more at... [ duck ] aflac! [ male announcer ] ...forbusiness.com. ♪ ha ha! you have a plan? first we're gonna check our bags for free,
thanks to our explorer card. then, the united club. my mother was so wrong about you. next, we get priority boarding on our flight i booked with miles. all because of the card. and me. okay, what's the plan? plan? mm-hmm. we're on vacation. this is no plan. really? [ male announcer ] the united mileageplus explorer card. the mileage card with special perks on united. get it and you're in. nothing complicated about a pair of 10 inch hose clamp pliers. you know what's complicated? shipping. shipping's complicated. not really. with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service shipping's easy. if it fits, it ships anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. that's not complicated. no. come on.
missouri republican senate candidate congressman todd akin has done something that is inconvenient for the republican party. he yelled look over here to everyone who hadn't noticed where the republican party is these days on women's health and women's rights. it's a sensitive subject given paul ryan, et cetera. todd akin stunk it up for many politicians, but not all republican politicians. there is a congressman who would be tonight's big headline politics story if todd akin wasn't occupying that position. this guy for one owed todd akin big time. his story is ahead. , for one own big time. his story is ahead.
ahhh, now that's a clean mouth. i just wish it wouldn't fade away so fast. let me show you something. [ dr. rahmany ] as soon as you leave here... plaque quickly starts to grow back. but now there's a way to keep the clean longer. introducing new crest pro-health clinical rinse. it's a clinical breakthrough that actually keeps your teeth 91% clean of plaque at 2 months after a dental visit. plus, it gives you these key benefits. new crest pro-health clinical rinse. crest. life opens up when you do. also try new crest pro-health clinical plaque control toothpaste.
with our babysitter. no. these work, right? no. all right. mom! look what i found in the shed! no! no! no! ♪ ew! were you guys just making out in here? what? no! is it okay if i quit my job and start a blog? no. really? cold cuts from a package? yes. [ male announcer ] in a world filled with "no," it's nice to finally say "yes." new oscar mayer selects deli meat. the tastes you love and no artificial preservatives. it's yes food. want to see what 1.3 million signatures look like when you put them together in one place?
last june, volunteers in the great state of ohio hand-delivered 1.3 million signatures. hand-delivered 1502 boxes in total to the secretary of state's office. 1.3 million ohioans signing petitions calling for repeal of the state's new union stripping law. in a group called we are ohio pulled up to the secretary of state's front door, dropped them on the secretary of state's doorstep. 1.3 million signatures is more signatures than the entire population of wyoming or vermont or north dakota or south dakota or alaska or delaware or montana or rhode island. those signatures getting dropped off there that day, 1.3 million of them, ultimately led to a people's repeal of the ohio republicans' stripping of union rights in that state. it wasn't even close. republicans saw their anti-union law overturned in a huge
blowout. well, that location you just saw there, the doorstep of the secretary of state's office was the scene of another small d democratic show of force. >> give the people the right to vote. let's open the polls and let the people vote. let them be heard. >> that was a rally at the ohio secretary of state's office today's. it was in support of these two gentlemen you see framed here. tom richie, sr. on the left and dennis lieberman on the right. why were all these people in ohio rallying behind these two meptoday at the secretary of state's office? because they're threatening to fire them. tom richie and dennis lieberman may lose their jobs this week for the crime of voting to expand voting hours in their county. tom richie and dennis lieberman are the two democratic members of the montgomery county board of elections.
it's a traditionally blue county in a sea of red counties in southwestern ohio, where there city of dayton is. dayton is famous not just for the dayton peace accords which ended the blood shed in bosnia, it's also where john mccain introduced sarah palin to the nation in 2008. dayton, ohio, and montgomery county, ultimately rejected sarah palin and john mccain in the election in 2008. they went for obama by six points in the presidential election. it did so on the strength of the residents there, frankly, having lots and lots of opportunity to cast their ballots. montgomery county had early voting on nights, early voting on weekends. plenty of opportunities to vote in the lead-up to the 2008 election. montgomery county residents took advantage of that. in particular, their african-american residents took advantage of that. more than half of the early votes cast in that county in 2008 were cast by black voters. heading into this year, into the
2012 presidential election, montgomery county elections officials wanted to repeat the success they had running a relatively hassle free, trouble free election back in 2008. last december, the two democrats that you saw earlier, tom richie and dennis lieberman were joined by the two republicans on the board of elections in voting to expand early voting hours in montgomery county. they voted to do that in 2008 and they voted to do it again in 2012. they wanted to offer early voting this year in nights and weekends and it was a bipartisan vote in favor of it in montgomery county which runs counter to what has been happening across the rest of the state. as we have been reporting on the show, what is happening in ohio this year is a mess. the county elections boards are equally divided, two republicans and two democrats in every county. the republicans have been voting to expand early voting hours in ruppen leaning counties but they have been voting against it in democratic counties. and that led to a situation where voters in traditionally
republican counties like butler county, for example, they would have had the opportunity to vote on nights and weekend while voters in traditionally blue counties like chiuyahoga county would not have that chance. in order to rectify that problem, in order to fix that blatantly biased set of rules, ohio's republican secretary of state last week came out finally and decided to take away expanded early voting hours for everyone. at least it was sort of standardized. for every single county across the state, he directed every county elections board to adopt the same hours for early voting during the week s leading up to election day. this is important. this is important. he did not say what should happen on the weekends. the hours that he distributed only laid out the rules for early voting on week days. in montgomery county which again had voted in a bipartisan manner to have early voting on weekends this year, the democrats on the board, they decided they would
give the weekends question another shot. so thomas richie and dennis lieberman voted on friday to go forward with weekend early voting there. and for those efforts, they were suspended from the elections board by the secretary of state for the crime of voting to offer the residents of their county more opportunity to vote. the republican secretary of state, john husted, has now threatened to remove them from office. think about this, though. he didn't just say no to the proposal for weekend voting. he didn't threaten to take away the jobs of the republicans who also participated in that vote and voted the other way. he didn't just fix his directive about early voting hours to close the loophole about weekends so it would also apply to weekends and be standardized across the state. instead, he just told the democrats and i'm quoting here, you leave me no choice but to begin to process of removingia from the montgomery county board of elections. remove? they were hauled before a state hearing that will ultimately decide their fate or help to decide their fate. they were grilled by an attorney for the secretary of state's
office. famous richie and dennis lieberman were put in the weird position of having to defend themselves against the charge that they used their power to avote to allow people more time to vote. >> you do as a board member take an oath to follow the laws of the state of ohio. >> the united states constitution and the ohio constitution. >> and part of that is to follow the directives issued by the secretary of state, correct? >> correct, which i believe i did. and still to this day believe i followed that directive. >> that directive which did not have instructions about weekends. thanks to the ohio capitol blog for providing the tape from the hearing today. thomas richie and dennis lieberman, both democrats who between them have more than 27 years of experience on their county elections board, they could be fired by the end of this week. for voting to expand voting hours for the residents of their county. they're going to be joining us live for the interview next. ic e
that puts us in control. our abundant natural gas is already saving us money, producing cleaner electricity, putting us to work here in america and supporting wind and solar. though all energy development comes with some risk, we're committed to safely and responsibly producing natural gas. it's not a dream. america's natural gas... putting us in control of our energy future, now. well another great thing about all this walking i've been doing is that it's given me time to reflect on some of life's biggest questions. like, if you could save hundreds on car insurance by making one simple call, why wouldn't you make that call? see, the only thing i can think of is that you can't get any... bars. ah, that's better. it's a beautiful view. i wonder if i can see mt. rushmore from here. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.
here at the hutchison household. but one dark stormy evening... she needed a good meal and a good family. so we gave her purina cat chow complete. it's the best because it has something for all of our cats! and after a couple of weeks she was part of the family. we're so lucky that lucy picked us. [ female announcer ] purina cat chow complete. and for a delicious way to help maintain a healthy weight, try new purina cat chow healthy weight.
have to use a friend of mine's line. under advice from counsel, i am just going to say let's open the polls and let the people vote. let them be heard. >> that was thomas richie, sr., a democratic member of the montgomery county ohio board of elections. today, mr. richie along with dennis lieberman were hauled before a state hearing and forced to argue that they should not be fired by ohio's republican secretary of state who is threatening to fire them. potengsomy fireable offense is that they voted to expand early voting hours in their county in ohio. joining us now for the interview are the two democratic members of the montgomery county ohio board of elections, dennis lieberman and thomas richie sr. i appreciate your time. >> thank you. >> mr. lieberman, let me start with you. how important was early voting on weekends in your county, in
montgomery county, the last time around in the 2008 presidential race? >> it was exceptionally important. you know, i can give you some numbers, we had 28,000 people that voted early. of those, one third of them voted them voted on weekends. in fact, there was the weekend beforehand, in which we had almost 8,000 people, the weekend before the election. i remember standing out on the lawn, and because there was so many people that they actually were lining up on the lawn, and we -- there was a college student that had a guitar and he was playing songs, and my republican counterpart on the board at the time looked at me with tears in his eyes and he said, this is what america is about. and he was right. it is. early voting in montgomery county is critical. >> let me ask about working with
your republican colleagues here. obviously, all the elections boards have two democrats and two republicans, and mr. ritchie, i'll ask you. under some other -- unlike some other democratic-leaning counties across the state, the republicans on your county board originally joined with you in wanting to expand early voting hours in the county. why do you think they originally went along with that, when republicans and a lot of other democratic counties were voting no on that? >> well, i think that they knew it was the right thing to do at the time they cast that vote, to let the people of the county vote. we had made that commitment to them in two previous board meetings, where they had appeared. and the republican board members voted to allow weekend voting. >> let me ask you -- this is to either of you. in terms of the technical matter here at hand, the secretary of state issued some guidelines about essentially standardizing some of the early voting hours. and it seemed from the -- most
people's reading of those guidelines, that he was saying that there would be no early voting on weekends and there would be some minimal expanded early votings on -- expanded early voting hours on weekend nights. is it your contention, when you took this vote last week, that he didn't actually instruct you, that you couldn't have early voting on weekends? do you think you have the right to do that? >> yes, i do. it was my motion, and the reason i made the motion is because we had already, in december -- on december 28th of 2011, we had already decided that we were going to have early voting in montgomery county on weekends as well as during the week. and it's authority that we have under the ohio revised code, i believe, to make those decisions. when i got his directive friday morning, and when tom got it, we looked at it, and i looked at the directive, and it talked
about regular business hours, monday through friday. now, the secretary of state knew that we had already voted in early voting on weekends and had been using it in montgomery county since 2008 and had actually used it in the primary, the presidential primary, this year, just a couple months earlier. so he knew we had it, and my thought was that if he knew we had it and he didn't address it, then we were free to fill in those blanks. and that's what we did. and my motion was to accept the directive that he had for weekdays and simply keep the weekends that we had decided. and we got a letter telling us to rescind the motion or be fired and i refused to rescind the motion. >> mr. lieberman, mr. ritchie, democratic members of the montgomery county ohio board of elections, i know that this is as of yet unresolved, this is still a pending matter, and i
know it, therefore, takes some guts to talk about it publicly in terms of what's going on, but thank you for being willing to explain it to us and good luck this week. please keep us posted. the whole country's paying a lot of attention to ohio for good reason. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thanks, gentleman. okay. do you want to know who won the news lottery today? the republican congressman whose own scandal was squeezed out of the headlines by the mr. legitimate rape todd akin scandal today. the guy who got squeezed out of the headlines and who is very thankful to mr. akin, we've got his story next.
humans -- sometimes life trips us up. and sometimes, we trip ourselves up, but that's okay. at liberty mutual insurance we can "untrip" you as you go through your life with personalized policies and discounts when you need them most. just call... and speak with a licensed representative about saving on your policy when you get married, move into a new house... [crash!] or add a car to your policy. don't forget to ask about saving up to 10% when you combine your auto and home insurance with liberty mutual. security, coverage, and savings. all the things humans need to make our beautifully imperfect world a little less imperfect.
call... and lock in your rate for 12 months. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy? who have used androgel 1%, there's big news. presenting androgel 1.62%. both are used to treat men with low testosterone. androgel 1.62% is from the makers of the number one prescribed testosterone replacement therapy. it raises your testosterone levels, and... is concentrated, so you could use less gel. and with androgel 1.62%, you can save on your monthly prescription. [ male announcer ] dosing and application sites between these products differ. women and children should avoid contact with application sites. discontinue androgel and call your doctor if you see unexpected signs of early puberty in a child, or, signs in a woman which may include changes in body hair or a large increase in acne, possibly due to accidental exposure. men with breast cancer or who have or might have prostate cancer,
and women who are, or may become pregnant or are breast feeding should not use androgel. serious side effects include worsening of an enlarged prostate, possible increased risk of prostate cancer, lower sperm count, swelling of ankles, feet, or body, enlarged or painful breasts, problems breathing during sleep, and blood clots in the legs. tell your doctor about your medical conditions and medications, especially insulin, corticosteroids, or medicines to decrease blood clotting. talk to your doctor today about androgel 1.62% so you can use less gel. log on now to androgeloffer.com and you could pay as little as ten dollars a month for androgel 1.62%. what are you waiting for? this is big news. and now a brand-new and possibly ill advised new rachel maddow show franchise, the best timing in the world today. in the best timing in the award goes to republican congressman from kansas, kevin yoder.
featured today in headlines like this that did appear in a few of today's papers. congressman kevin yoder's nude swim yields an apology. representative yoder apologizes for skinny dipping in sea of galilee. gop colleagues, yoder's nude swim breaches trust. politico had the story first, posting this banner headline that's, "exclusive:fbi probed gop trip with drinking, nudity in israel." it apparently happened during a congressional delegation to israel last summer. a group of republican congressmen brought to israel by a foundation connected to a pro-israel lobbying group. and one night, some members of the delegation went to this restaurant that is right on the sea of galilee. you know, the one you read about in the bible. not the restaurant, but the sea. the restaurant is called decks. and you can apparently jump right off one of the decks into the water, into the sea. and reportedly about 20 members of this delegation did just that. and all of the swimmers can kept at least some of their clothes
on. except for one. "congressman yoder removed all his clothes, the only person to do so, according to multiple sources." some of those present took photographs of the group right after the late-night swim, sources said. dude, everybody threw you under the bus for being naked. today, congressman yoder went on a local radio show to explain the naked in the sea of galilee thing. >> members decided at the sea of galilee, they wanted to take a spontaneous dive into the sea and at some point, i decided to join them and made the real mistake of going in without clothing, and it's a regrettable incident. we were, you know, having wine with dinner, but alcohol really played no role in the decision to go in. >> judgment was unimpaired when you took all of your clothes off and jumped into a body water that is closely associated with not one, but two miracles of jesus. forha